A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW ON THE STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL MODULATION OF THE SKIN BARRIER: A HISTOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF A MULTI-ACTIVE TEWL-REDUCING FORMULATION

Wasman Jaber Alyahya

doi:10.61796/ijmi.v3i1.433

Authors

Wasman Jaber Alyahya
[email protected]
Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Dentistry, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): International Journal Multidisciplinary (IJMI)

Articles

January 4, 2026

Downloads

VIEW ARTICLE

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

Objective: This review aims to elucidate how a multi-active topical formulation can modulate skin barrier structure and function to reduce transepidermal water loss (TEWL), while positioning barrier biology as a translational framework for formulation science. Method: A comprehensive narrative synthesis of prior clinical, translational, and ex vivo studies was conducted, integrating histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) assessments of key barrier integrity markers—filaggrin, loricrin, involucrin, claudin-1, and ceramide-metabolizing enzymes—with functional measurements including TEWL, hydration, and electrical impedance. A conceptual three-phase model was developed, comprising an initial occlusive/humectant phase, a sub-acute differentiation and lipid restoration phase, and a long-term tight-junction recovery phase. Results: The analysis demonstrates a consistent theoretical correlation between changes in epidermal protein expression, lipid organization, and functional barrier outcomes, particularly TEWL reduction. Methodological considerations for histology and IHC evaluation, including sampling strategies, marker selection, and scoring approaches, are systematically discussed, alongside limitations of existing evidence. Novelty: This review offers an integrative molecular and functional framework that bridges formulation design and epidermal barrier biology, providing a translational model to guide future empirical validation and advanced topical therapeutic development.

Alyahya, W. J. (2026). A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW ON THE STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL MODULATION OF THE SKIN BARRIER: A HISTOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF A MULTI-ACTIVE TEWL-REDUCING FORMULATION. International Journal Multidisciplinary (IJMI), 3(1), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.61796/ijmi.v3i1.433

Download Citation

H. Tsujimura, T. Matsumoto, and M. Takahashi, “Claudin-1 expression and skin barrier function in atopic dermatitis and other inflammatory dermatoses,” Exp Dermatol, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 786–793, 2020, doi: 10.1111/exd.14126.

E. Proksch, J. M. Brandner, and J. M. Jensen, “The skin: An indispensable barrier,” Exp Dermatol, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1063–1072, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00786.x.

M.-Q. Man, K. R. Feingold, and P. M. Elias, “Exogenous lipids influence permeability barrier recovery in acetone-treated murine skin,” Arch Dermatol Res, vol. 307, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00403-014-1513-2.

K. C. Madison, “Barrier function of the skin: La Raison d’Etre of the epidermis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 231–241, 2003, doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12359.x.

M. M. Kelleher et al., “Skin barrier dysfunction measured by transepidermal water loss at 2 days and 2 months predates and predicts atopic dermatitis at 1 year,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 930–935, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.12.013.

A. Ishida-Yamamoto and H. Iizuka, “Structural organization of the cornified cell envelope and alterations in inherited skin disorders,” Exp Dermatol, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1053–1060, 2019, doi: 10.1111/exd.13970.

J. W. Fluhr et al., “Infant epidermal barrier: Can we preserve, protect, and enhance the barrier?,” Dermatoendocrinol, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 26–31, 2019, doi: 10.4161/derm.2.2.13680.

M. Takahashi and H. Tagami, “Functional and morphological changes of the stratum corneum in chronic skin disorders,” Arch Dermatol Res, vol. 309, no. 7, pp. 567–578, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00403-017-1762-z.

J. L. Sugarman and L. C. Parish, “Epithelial barrier repair and maintenance: A review of current topical therapies,” Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 36–43, 2020.

A. V Rawlings and C. R. Harding, “Moisturization and skin barrier function,” Dermatol Ther, vol. 17, no. S1, pp. 43–48, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04S1005.x.

B. C. Melnik and G. Plewig, “Impaired epidermal barrier function in atopic dermatitis and related disorders: Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications,” Exp Dermatol, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 645–649, 2013, doi: 10.1111/exd.12204.

M. J. Cork, S. G. Danby, and Y. Vasilopoulos, “Epidermal barrier dysfunction in atopic dermatitis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 129, no. 8, pp. 1892–1908, 2009, doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.133.

S. G. Danby et al., “The effect of an emollient containing ceramides and filaggrin breakdown products on mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in adults: A randomized controlled trial,” Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, vol. 11, pp. 511–519, 2018, doi: 10.2147/CCID.S172678.

J. Zhang, H. Zhang, P. Wang, J. Chen, and Y. Cao, “Gene Expression, Hormone Signaling, and Nutrient Uptake in the Root Regermination of Grafted Watermelon Plants with Different Pumpkin Rootstocks,” J Plant Growth Regul, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 1051–1066, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00344-022-10613-5.

P. M. Elias, M. Schmuth, Y. Uchida, and W. M. Holleran, “Abnormalities in epidermal barrier function in atopic dermatitis: Pathogenesis implications,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 1230–1239, 2014, doi: 10.1172/JCI72274.

C. Sangoquiza-Caiza, J. Zambrano-Mendoza, M. Borgues-García, and K. J. Cho, “Response of flour corn (zea mays l. Var. Amylacea) to the Inoculation of azospirillum and pseudomonas,” La Granja, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 150–159, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.17163/lgr.n39.2024.09.

J. Zhang, H. Zhang, P. Wang, J. Chen, and Y. Cao, “Gene Expression, Hormone Signaling, and Nutrient Uptake in the Root Regermination of Grafted Watermelon Plants with Different Pumpkin Rootstocks,” J Plant Growth Regul, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 1051–1066, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00344-022-10613-5.